Saturday, November 29, 2008
Flinders Petrie on the Discovery of the Moabite Stone
This is (presumably) one of the earliest accounts of the discovery of the Moabite Stone. Due to its age this article is now Public Domain.
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Joe M. Sprinkle on 2 Kings 3 - History or Historical Fiction?
Joe M. Sprinkle, "2 Kings 3: History or Historical Fiction?" Bulletin for Biblical Research 9 (1999): 247-270.
Summary:
It has become fashionable in recent decades for biblical scholars, sometimes termed “biblical minimalists,” to deny thoroughly the historicity of virtually all biblical narratives. 2 Kings 3 has not escaped this trend to repudiate reconstructions that harmonize the biblical account with extrabiblical data, in this case with the Mesha Inscription (Moabite Stone). Rather, such minimalists label 2 Kings 3 “historical fiction” with the emphasis on fiction and see little genuine history in the chapter. This paper examines the arguments of biblical minimalists concerning 2 Kings 3 in comparison with the Mesha Inscription and presents what can be termed a “historical maximalist” response for this story, evaluating the arguments of the minimalists while providing a positive historical reconstruction of this period on “maximalist” assumptions. It is concluded that a reconstruction that takes both 2 Kings 3 and the Mesha Inscription as essentially accurate history is possible, and that the objections raised by historical minimalists to such a reconstruction, though not without weight, are by no means conclusive. Hence, historical maximalism for 2 Kings 3 appears to be a viable option.