Tuesday, May 3, 2011
George I. Mavrodes on the Inspiration of Autographs
George I. Mavrodes, "The Inspiration of Autographs," The Evangelical Quarterly 41.1 (Jan.-Mar. 1969): 19-29.
This article appears by kind permission of the author.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
J. Theodore Mueller on The Holy Spirit and the Scriptures
Sunday, May 17, 2009
B.B. Warfield on the Inspiration of the Bible
B.B. Warfield summarises what is often regarded as the classic statement of the subject.
Thursday, May 7, 2009
R.A. Finlayson on Contemporary Ideas of Inspiration
Monday, May 4, 2009
Geoffrey W. Bromiley on the Church Doctrine of Inspiration
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Alan M. Stibbs on The Witness of Scripture to Its Inspiration
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Carl F.H. Henry, ed., Revelation and the Bible - first section now-on-line
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
"Revelation and the Bible" to be placed online
Table of Contents
Preface by Carl F.H. Henry, pp.7-10
3 Paul K. Jewett - Special Revelation as Historical and Personal, pp.43-57
4 William J. Martin - Special Revelation as Objective, pp.59-72
6 James I. Packer - Contemporary Views of Revelation, pp.87-104
7 Alan M. Stibbs - The Witness of Scripture to its Inspiration, pp.105-118
8 Pierre Ch. Marcel - Our Lord's Use of Scripture, pp.119-134
9 Roger Nicole - New Testament Use of the Old Testament, pp.135-151
10 Edward J. Young - The Canon of the Old Testament, pp.153-168
11 G. Douglas Young - The Apocrypha, pp.169-185
12 Herman Ridderbos - The Canon of the New Testament, pp.187-201
13 Geoffrey W. Bromiley - The Church Doctrine of Inspiration, pp.203-217
14 R.A. Finlayson - Contemporary Ideas of Inspiration, pp.219-234
15 Everett F. Harrison - The Phenomena of Scripture, pp.235-250
16 Bernard Ramm - The Evidence of Prophecy and Miracle, 251-263
17 J. Theodore Mueller - The Holy Spirit and the Scriptures, pp.265-281
18 Ernest F. Kevan - The Principles of Interpretation, pp.283-298
19 Donald J. Wiseman - Archaeological Confirmation of the Old Testament, pp.299-316
20 F.F. Bruce - Archaeological Confirmation of the New Testament, pp.317-331
21 N.H. Ridderbos - Reversals of Old Testament Criticism, pp.333-350
22 Merrill C. Tenney - Reversals of New Testament Criticism, pp.351-367
23 J. Norval Geldenhuys - Authority and the Bible, pp.369-386
24 Frank E. Gaebelein - The Unity of the Bible, pp.87-401
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
A.N.S. Lane on B.B. Warfield and the Humanity of Scripture
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Donald Guthrie on Biblical Authority and New Testament Scholarship
Monday, December 24, 2007
Gordon R. Lewis on the Meaning of Infallibility
Gordon R. Lewis, "What Does Biblical Infallibility Mean?" Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society 6.1 (Winter 1963): 18-27.
(1) Although there is a clear distinction today between meaning and sentences, inspiration may be viewed as implying neither merely conceptual or merely verbal supervision on the part of the Holy Spirit. Inspiration in this realm of discourse applies to both content and wording, meanings and sentences.
(2) “Inerrancy” may be used most clearly for meanings which are cognitively taught by those with delegated authority as spokesmen for God, and for non-cognitive meanings relating to the speakers themselves.
(3) “Infallibility” most helpfully designates the verbal media of the Scriptures as effective communicators of the Spirit-intended meaning through the Biblical writings.
(4) All that is written in Scripture is infallible. All that Scripture teaches cognitively is objectively true. All that Scripture teaches non-cognitively is subjectively true, i.e. true of the one whose idea is expressed. This then is a plenary view of verbal inspiration; all sentences are infallible, and all meanings are inerrant for their respective purposes.
Thursday, October 25, 2007
F.F. Bruce on the Authority and Power of the Bible
F.F. Bruce, "The Lausanne Covenant - 2: The Authority and Power of the Bible," The Harvester 55 (November 1976): 320-333.
F.F. Bruce explains and critiques the section of the Lausanne Covenant which deals with the authority and power of the Bible.
Friday, September 7, 2007
H.L. Ellison on Biblical Inspiration
H.L. Ellison, "Some Thoughts on Inspiration," The Evangelical Quarterly 26.4 (1954): 210-217.
This is my favourite quote [p.214}:
If we are prepared to say that the Scriptures contain, are and become the Word of God, we occupy a position which seems to cover all the facts of revelation and spiritual experience.
We are not, as some might think, making mere empty distinctions. To call the Bible the Word of God without some such qualifications, spoken or understood, suggests that the work of inspiration ended with the finishing of the record, and that the Bible now functions by virtue of some inherent power, so that anything that man may infer from it is necessarily legitimate. We would do well to widen our conception of inspiration. The writing of the Scriptures was only the half-way house in the process of inspiration; it only reaches its goal and conclusion as God is revealed through them to the reader or hearer. In other words, the inbreathing of the Holy Spirit into the reader is as essential for the right understanding of the Scriptures as it was in the original writers for their right production of them.[1]
[1] This is the view adopted in The New Bible Handbook (I.V.F., 1947), p. 10.
Sunday, February 18, 2007
F.F. Bruce on Biblical Inspiration
F.F. Bruce, M.A., "What Do We Mean By Biblical Inspiration?" Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute 78 (1946): 121-139.
The format is unusual as it is a lecture, followed by oral and written responses and then a conclusion by the author.